0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Anubis (M1)
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Titulaire
Composition de l'équipe
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Ancient
63%
Vertigo
56%
Nuke
56%
Inferno
45%
Anubis
41%
Mirage
37%
Overpass
22%
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
63%
30
1
Vertigo
56%
16
14
Nuke
56%
25
2
Inferno
45%
22
15
Anubis
41%
27
4
Mirage
37%
19
32
Overpass
22%
9
45
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- pgggg
- pgggg
Informations
Map Analysis of eHawks vs ThunderFlash by the Bo3.gg Team
on Anubis Analysis
demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 0 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for on Anubis were , who contributed 0 kills, and , who added 0 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
eHawks on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for eHawks, as they managed to secure 0 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for eHawks on Anubis included , who contributed 0 kills, and , who added 0 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 0 total damage, eHawks couldn't prevent from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, eHawks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires