0 Commentaires
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:28s01:30s
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
61.8064
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
16.65.6
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
20.35.6
Éliminations avec Tec-9 en moyenne par carte
41.3055
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2615.0371
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
10.82
Tirs (total/round)
8316
Score du joueur (round)
35481012
Multikills x-
4
Informations
Map Analysis of EG Black vs Nouns by the Bo3.gg Team
Nouns on Inferno Analysis
Nouns demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Nouns on Inferno were cynic, who contributed 26 kills, and nosraC, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10944 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Nouns held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
EG Black on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for EG Black, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for EG Black on Inferno included RUSH, who contributed 24 kills, and Walco, who added 21 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10834 total damage, EG Black couldn't prevent Nouns from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, EG Black struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires