Avantages des équipes
Score
6
6.6
Inferno0.5
Manches gagnées
14
16
Inferno2
Éliminations
98
116
Inferno18
Dégâts
10.74K
12.73K
Inferno1992
Économie
563.8K
620.05K
Inferno56250
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
10.52
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
60.925.3
Score du joueur (round)
42171012
Score du joueur (round)
35851012
Tirs (total/round)
8916
Score du joueur (round)
37651012
Score du joueur (round)
37751012
Dégâts (total/round)
42373
Dégâts (total/round)
38673
Score du joueur (round)
35801012
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Informations
Match analysis of eetswa vs CAMO by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between eetswa and CAMO, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by CAMO. The MVP of this match was SWANKY.
CAMO analytics
The team CAMO secured 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for CAMO were PeetyG contributed 32 kills and NikkeZ contributed 30 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 12733 overall damage.
On the defensive side, CAMO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
eetswa analytics
The team eetswa managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for eetswa were SWANKY contributed 30 kills and MCHUN contributed 27 kills. 10741 of total damage by eetswa could not prevent CAMO from securing the victory
On the defensive side, eetswa struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires