0 Commentaires
70
76
27
-6
361
11:10
18
0
-3%
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M2)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
13.64.7
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
16.33.4
Score du joueur (round)
37831011
Tirs (total/round)
8716
Dégâts (total/round)
39573
Score du joueur (round)
38651011
As du joueur
1
As du joueur
1
Éliminations d'équipier
1
Dégâts des grenades HE (total/round)
9326.5
Informations
Map Analysis of ECSTATIC vs Guild Eagles by the Bo3.gg Team
ECSTATIC on Inferno Analysis
ECSTATIC demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for ECSTATIC on Inferno were Nodios, who contributed 20 kills, and kraghen, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8311 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, ECSTATIC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Guild Eagles on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Guild Eagles, as they managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Guild Eagles on Inferno included juanflatroo, who contributed 23 kills, and SENER1, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7942 total damage, Guild Eagles couldn't prevent ECSTATIC from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Guild Eagles struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires