0 Commentaires
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
1614.2369
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
01:06s00:35s
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
146.3792
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
71.925.2
Éliminations avec Tec-9 en moyenne par carte
21.3022
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
6.12
Assistances en moyenne par carte
94.4987
Tirs (total/round)
10916
Score du joueur (round)
37411010
Multikills x-
4
Informations
Map Analysis of ECSTATIC vs ALASKA by the Bo3.gg Team
ECSTATIC on Inferno Analysis
ECSTATIC demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for ECSTATIC on Inferno were nut nut, who contributed 19 kills, and Kristou, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7153 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, ECSTATIC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
ALASKA on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for ALASKA, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for ALASKA on Inferno included Tree, who contributed 10 kills, and Vacancy, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5481 total damage, ALASKA couldn't prevent ECSTATIC from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, ALASKA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires