0 Commentaires
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
01:31s00:39s
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2215.0371
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
19.13.4
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
206.732
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
98.925.3
Éliminations en moyenne par carte
3317.5558
Dégâts en moyenne (par tour)
167.71939.7
Victoires éco contre achat complet
1
Dégâts (total/round)
40073
Score du joueur (round)
53521012
Informations
Map Analysis of ECLOT vs Entropiq by the Bo3.gg Team
ECLOT on Inferno Analysis
ECLOT demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for ECLOT on Inferno were Dytor, who contributed 33 kills, and nbqq, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9200 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, ECLOT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Entropiq on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Entropiq, as they managed to secure 6 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Entropiq on Inferno included PlesseN, who contributed 17 kills, and AJTT, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7156 total damage, Entropiq couldn't prevent ECLOT from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Entropiq struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires