0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Dust II
50%
Anubis
35%
Vertigo
21%
Mirage
8%
Overpass
7%
Ancient
7%
Inferno
5%
Nuke
2%
Dernières 5 cartes
Dust II
50%
2
4
Anubis
75%
4
20
Vertigo
71%
21
6
Mirage
61%
23
6
Overpass
40%
20
19
Ancient
52%
23
9
Inferno
54%
35
1
Nuke
40%
5
35
Dernières 5 cartes
Dust II
100%
1
0
Anubis
40%
5
3
Vertigo
50%
2
12
Mirage
53%
19
3
Overpass
33%
9
5
Ancient
45%
11
5
Inferno
59%
17
1
Nuke
38%
8
5
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- ggggp
- gpggp
Informations
Match analysis of ECLOT vs Enterprise by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ECLOT and Enterprise, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Overpass, and victory was secured by ECLOT. The MVP of this match was anarkez.
ECLOT analytics
The team ECLOT secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ECLOT were anarkez contributed 24 kills and K1-FiDa contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10875 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ECLOT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Enterprise analytics
The team Enterprise managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Enterprise were system contributed 22 kills and Pechyn contributed 22 kills. 9861 of total damage by Enterprise could not prevent ECLOT from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Enterprise struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires