Terminé
1
Basique

0 Commentaires

Mirage
11 - 13
Nuke
13 - 11
Ancient
13 - 7
DRILLAS Tableau des résultats

+/-

SCORES DES CARTES

56

46

20

+10

92

5:5

16

2

Mirage5.7

6.9

+34%

56

42

9

+14

77

8:10

16

2

Mirage6.9

6.5

+3%

54

55

19

-1

90

11:13

15

0

Mirage5.6

6.4

-4%

48

43

10

+5

72

5:4

13

1

Mirage6.2

6.1

+4%

35

45

18

-10

66

5:2

10

0

Mirage5.5

5.5

-12%

Total

249

231

76

+18

397

34:34

70

5

Mirage6

6.3

+5%

WOPA Tableau des résultats

+/-

SCORES DES CARTES

58

50

13

+8

91

6:5

16

0

Mirage6.6

6.7

+18%

47

47

11

0

72

8:11

11

3

Mirage6.9

6.0

+1%

43

53

21

-10

78

13:13

12

0

Mirage4.8

5.9

-15%

40

49

11

-9

67

2:1

8

0

Mirage6.1

5.5

-2%

42

50

11

-8

63

5:4

5

0

Mirage6.3

5.4

0%

Total

230

249

67

-19

371

34:34

52

3

Mirage6.1

5.9

+1%

SkinClub Worldwide
score predict & Analytics Insights
2 - 0
Résultat
2 - 1
1 - 2
0 - 2
Avantages des équipes

Cartes

Score

6.3

5.9

Mirage0.1

Manches gagnées

37

31

Mirage2

Éliminations

249

230

Mirage3

Dégâts

26.81K

25.33K

Mirage282

Économie

1.31M

1.26M

Mirage11250

Enregistrements Match

Record/Temps/Carte

Val/M

Établi par

Adversaire

Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte

  •  Ancient

51.8168

Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte

  •  Ancient

31.4516

Éliminations avec Desert Eagle en moyenne par carte

  •  Ancient

51.6427

Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte

  •  Ancient

41.4516

Round rapide (sec)

  •  Ancient

00:23s01:55s

Round rapide (sec)

  •  Ancient

00:26s01:55s

Round rapide (sec)

  •  Ancient

00:32s01:55s

Round rapide (sec)

  •  Ancient

00:35s01:55s

Score du joueur (round)

  •  Ancient

36211010

Score du joueur (round)

  •  Ancient

34971010

Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Choix & interdictions

Il n'y a actuellement aucune information liée à ce choix de cartes
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois

Vertigo

46%

Ancient

40%

Anubis

29%

Mirage

24%

Dust II

4%

Nuke

2%

Inferno

0%

Dernières 5 cartes

Vertigo

100%

3

1

g
g
g

Ancient

75%

12

0

g
p
p
g
g

Anubis

60%

5

4

g
g
p
g
p

Mirage

64%

11

0

p
g
p
g
g

Dust II

50%

4

4

p
g
p
g

Nuke

50%

8

5

fb
p
g
g
p

Inferno

50%

2

11

fb
fb
p
fb
g

Dernières 5 cartes

Vertigo

54%

13

0

p
g
p
p
p

Ancient

35%

31

2

g
p
p
p
p

Anubis

31%

36

0

p
p
p
g
p

Mirage

40%

25

0

p
p
p
g
p

Dust II

54%

13

3

p
p
g
fb
p

Nuke

48%

25

1

p
g
g
p
g

Inferno

50%

4

4

g
fb
fb
p
g
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Les équipes ne se sont pas rencontrées au cours des 6 derniers mois
Matchs précédents
Informations
Match analysis of DRILLAS vs WOPA by the Bo3.gg Team

In the CS2 match between DRILLAS and WOPA, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Ancient, Nuke, Mirage, and victory was secured by DRILLAS. The MVP of this match was SENER1.


DRILLAS analytics

The team DRILLAS secured 37 out of 68 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Nuke. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.


The standout players for DRILLAS were SENER1 contributed 56 kills and Woro2k contributed 56 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 26812 overall damage.


On the defensive side, DRILLAS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 20 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.


WOPA analytics

The team WOPA managed to secure 31 out of 68 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.


The standout players for WOPA were sL1m3 contributed 58 kills and Vster contributed 47 kills. 25332 of total damage by WOPA could not prevent DRILLAS from securing the victory


On the defensive side, WOPA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 19 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Commentaires
Par date