0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Score
6.3
6.3
Anubis0
Manches gagnées
12
16
Anubis4
Éliminations
100
98
Anubis-2
Dégâts
10.9K
10.59K
Anubis-313
Économie
623.9K
596.45K
Anubis-27450
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
41.4429
Round rapide (sec)
00:24s01:54s
Round rapide (sec)
00:27s01:54s
Round rapide (sec)
00:34s01:54s
Score du joueur (round)
41741011
Dégâts (total/round)
39773
Score du joueur (round)
38271011
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Informations
Match analysis of Diablos vs Detonate by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Diablos and Detonate, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by Detonate. The MVP of this match was Red-Spoon.
Detonate analytics
The team Detonate secured 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Detonate were FuuuZion contributed 23 kills and tr1cks contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10590 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Detonate held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Diablos analytics
The team Diablos managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Diablos were Red-Spoon contributed 23 kills and Driftzzzz contributed 23 kills. 10903 of total damage by Diablos could not prevent Detonate from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Diablos struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires