0 Commentaires
Records Mirage
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec AWP en moyenne par carte
206.5798
Dégâts avec AWP en moyenne (par tour)
71.521.6
Éliminations en ouverture en moyenne par carte
9.862.9135
Score du joueur (round)
35521012
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Durée des éblouissements par flash sur un round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Durée des éblouissements par flash sur un round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Durée des éblouissements par flash sur un round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Durée des éblouissements par flash sur un round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Informations
Map Analysis of DGG vs Paradox by the Bo3.gg Team
DGG on Mirage Analysis
DGG demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for DGG on Mirage were zeph, who contributed 32 kills, and nexar, who added 27 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 10796 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Mirage, DGG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Paradox on Mirage Analysis
Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for Paradox, as they managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Paradox on Mirage included chelleos, who contributed 23 kills, and asap, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10450 total damage, Paradox couldn't prevent DGG from securing victory on Mirage
On the defensive side of Mirage, Paradox struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires