0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M0)
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Mirage
77%
Ancient
68%
Vertigo
65%
Overpass
59%
Inferno
32%
Nuke
29%
Dust II
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
23%
13
0
Ancient
0%
2
2
Vertigo
0%
0
1
Overpass
20%
5
0
Inferno
25%
12
0
Nuke
33%
3
1
Dust II
57%
7
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
100%
1
53
Ancient
68%
40
8
Vertigo
65%
23
10
Overpass
79%
33
11
Inferno
57%
28
16
Nuke
62%
39
8
Dust II
57%
35
13
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- pp
- pggpg
Informations
Map Analysis of Dark Tigers vs MASONIC by the Bo3.gg Team
MASONIC on Inferno Analysis
MASONIC demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for MASONIC on Inferno were j3nsyy, who contributed 19 kills, and notaN, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7548 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, MASONIC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Dark Tigers on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Dark Tigers, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Dark Tigers on Inferno included CreZe, who contributed 24 kills, and Rutk0, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7876 total damage, Dark Tigers couldn't prevent MASONIC from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Dark Tigers struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires