0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Score
6.4
5.9
Inferno0
Manches gagnées
27
32
Inferno2
Éliminations
212
197
Inferno-10
Dégâts
22.88K
21.57K
Inferno-686
Économie
1.28M
1.23M
Inferno-59100
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Overpass
60%
Nuke
50%
Mirage
50%
Ancient
33%
Vertigo
29%
Inferno
17%
Dust II
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Overpass
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Inferno
50%
2
0
Dust II
0%
1
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Overpass
60%
5
1
Nuke
50%
12
0
Mirage
50%
4
2
Ancient
33%
6
3
Vertigo
29%
7
1
Inferno
67%
3
2
Dust II
0%
0
5
Informations
Match analysis of d0gs vs Genk by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between d0gs and Genk, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Nuke, Inferno, and victory was secured by Genk. The MVP of this match was ryu.
Genk analytics
The team Genk secured 59 out of 59 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Inferno. They also successfully set 14 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Genk were ryu contributed 57 kills and Rezst contributed 47 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21565 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Genk held their ground firmly, successfully defending 29 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
d0gs analytics
The team d0gs managed to secure 0 out of 59 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for d0gs were rilax contributed 53 kills and G1DO contributed 38 kills. 22876 of total damage by d0gs could not prevent Genk from securing the victory
On the defensive side, d0gs struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires