0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Ancient (M1)
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Mirage
67%
Dust II
60%
Inferno
57%
Vertigo
50%
Nuke
33%
Anubis
18%
Ancient
15%
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
67%
15
2
Dust II
40%
10
10
Inferno
57%
7
14
Vertigo
50%
18
3
Nuke
33%
6
13
Anubis
68%
38
2
Ancient
41%
22
1
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
0%
0
0
Dust II
100%
1
0
Inferno
0%
1
0
Vertigo
100%
3
0
Nuke
0%
2
0
Anubis
50%
8
0
Ancient
56%
9
0
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- ppggg
- gpppp
Informations
Map Analysis of CYBERSHOKE vs RUSTEC by the Bo3.gg Team
RUSTEC on Ancient Analysis
RUSTEC demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for RUSTEC on Ancient were KaRnez, who contributed 19 kills, and Fleer, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 8753 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, RUSTEC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
CYBERSHOKE on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for CYBERSHOKE, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Ancient included levantino, who contributed 21 kills, and lov1kus, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8901 total damage, CYBERSHOKE couldn't prevent RUSTEC from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, CYBERSHOKE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires