0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Ancient (M1)
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Mirage
55%
Vertigo
49%
Inferno
45%
Dust II
33%
Ancient
29%
Anubis
13%
Nuke
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
0%
0
0
Vertigo
100%
1
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Ancient
25%
4
0
Anubis
50%
2
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Mirage
55%
38
8
Vertigo
51%
37
3
Inferno
45%
20
11
Dust II
33%
3
5
Ancient
54%
56
1
Anubis
63%
38
6
Nuke
0%
0
40
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- gg
- pgpgg
Informations
Map Analysis of Denial vs Passion UA by the Bo3.gg Team
Passion UA on Ancient Analysis
Passion UA demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Passion UA on Ancient were s-chilla, who contributed 18 kills, and Jambo, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 7635 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, Passion UA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Denial on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for Denial, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Denial on Ancient included Andree, who contributed 16 kills, and mertz, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6309 total damage, Denial couldn't prevent Passion UA from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, Denial struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires