0 Commentaires
85
98
22
-13
348
15:12
19
2
-7%
avantage aux équipes Ancient (M2)
Records Ancient
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:32s01:30s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:21s01:30s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:30s01:30s
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
3115.0371
Score du joueur (round)
44181012
Tirs (total/round)
8316
Score du joueur (round)
37821012
Tirs (total/round)
8616
Tirs (total/round)
9116
Multikills x-
4
Informations
Map Analysis of Copenhagen Flames vs HAVU by the Bo3.gg Team
HAVU on Ancient Analysis
HAVU demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 16 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for HAVU on Ancient were ottoNd, who contributed 25 kills, and xseveN, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 10348 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, HAVU held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Copenhagen Flames on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for Copenhagen Flames, as they managed to secure 11 out of 27 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Copenhagen Flames on Ancient included b0RUP, who contributed 28 kills, and Farlig, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9398 total damage, Copenhagen Flames couldn't prevent HAVU from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, Copenhagen Flames struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires