0 Commentaires
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Round rapide (sec)
00:24s01:55s
Round rapide (sec)
00:29s01:55s
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Dust II
100%
Nuke
58%
Anubis
14%
Inferno
6%
Ancient
6%
Mirage
3%
Vertigo
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Dust II
100%
1
17
Nuke
58%
24
5
Anubis
56%
25
2
Inferno
50%
14
9
Ancient
56%
66
0
Mirage
60%
42
1
Vertigo
50%
10
4
Dernières 5 cartes
Dust II
0%
0
3
Nuke
0%
1
5
Anubis
42%
26
3
Inferno
56%
16
3
Ancient
50%
30
0
Mirage
57%
37
0
Vertigo
50%
6
6
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- pgggp
- pgggp
Informations
Match analysis of CPH Wolves vs Lilmix by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between CPH Wolves and Lilmix, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by CPH Wolves. The MVP of this match was sense.
CPH Wolves analytics
The team CPH Wolves secured 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for CPH Wolves were sense contributed 27 kills and Szejn contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8700 overall damage.
On the defensive side, CPH Wolves held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Lilmix analytics
The team Lilmix managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Lilmix were PALM1 contributed 15 kills and dex contributed 15 kills. 7549 of total damage by Lilmix could not prevent CPH Wolves from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Lilmix struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires