CPH Wolves Tableau des résultats Inferno (M3)

+/-

SCORES DES RONDS

2

1

0

+1

90

0:0

1

0

8.8

+51%

0

1

0

-1

55

0:0

0

0

4.3

-53%

0

1

1

-1

55

0:0

0

0

3.2

-52%

0

1

0

-1

55

0:0

0

0

3.2

-58%

0

1

1

-1

55

0:1

0

0

2.2

-57%

Total

2

5

2

-3

310

0:1

1

0

4.4

-34%

Leo Tableau des résultats Inferno (M3)

+/-

SCORES DES RONDS

2

1

1

+1

145

1:0

1

0

10.0

+90%

2

0

2

+2

200

0:0

1

0

10.0

+201%

1

0

1

+1

100

0:0

0

0

8.9

+58%

0

1

1

-1

55

0:0

0

0

4.7

-62%

0

0

0

0

0

0:0

0

0

3.8

-33%

Total

5

2

5

+3

500

1:0

2

0

7.5

+51%

avantage aux équipes Inferno (M3)
Informations
Map Analysis of CPH Wolves vs Leo by the Bo3.gg Team

Leo on Inferno Analysis

Leo demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 1 out of 1 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Leo on Inferno were kr1vda, who contributed 2 kills, and OneUn1que, who added 2 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 500 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Leo held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


CPH Wolves on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for CPH Wolves, as they managed to secure 0 out of 1 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for CPH Wolves on Inferno included Fessor, who contributed 2 kills, and sense, who added 0 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 310 total damage, CPH Wolves couldn't prevent Leo from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, CPH Wolves struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Commentaires
Par date