0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Vertigo (M1)
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Overpass
75%
Vertigo
71%
Nuke
50%
Inferno
48%
Anubis
33%
Ancient
7%
Mirage
5%
Dernières 5 cartes
Overpass
75%
12
2
Vertigo
71%
24
1
Nuke
0%
0
30
Inferno
48%
21
0
Anubis
33%
18
6
Ancient
57%
7
19
Mirage
55%
11
10
Dernières 5 cartes
Overpass
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
2
0
Nuke
50%
2
0
Inferno
0%
1
0
Anubis
0%
1
0
Ancient
50%
2
0
Mirage
50%
2
0
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- gpppg
- gppg
Informations
Map Analysis of Coalesce vs Geekz Energy by the Bo3.gg Team
Coalesce on Vertigo Analysis
Coalesce demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Coalesce on Vertigo were dox, who contributed 22 kills, and Gizmy, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 10898 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Coalesce held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Geekz Energy on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for Geekz Energy, as they managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Geekz Energy on Vertigo included entz, who contributed 18 kills, and Ersin, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8331 total damage, Geekz Energy couldn't prevent Coalesce from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Geekz Energy struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires