0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Score
7
5.2
Anubis1.8
Manches gagnées
16
6
Anubis10
Éliminations
94
58
Anubis36
Dégâts
9.98K
6.94K
Anubis3039
Économie
504.8K
348.15K
Anubis156650
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Vertigo
74%
Ancient
50%
Inferno
47%
Mirage
1
45%
Anubis
38%
Overpass
23%
Nuke
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Vertigo
74%
19
1
Ancient
50%
6
18
Inferno
47%
19
0
Mirage
55%
11
10
Anubis
38%
16
6
Overpass
73%
11
1
Nuke
0%
0
28
Dernières 5 cartes
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Mirage
100%
1
0
Anubis
0%
1
0
Overpass
50%
2
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Informations
Match analysis of Coalesce vs 141 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Coalesce and 141, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by Coalesce. The MVP of this match was leaf.
Coalesce analytics
The team Coalesce secured 16 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Coalesce were leaf contributed 25 kills and AZUWU contributed 27 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9980 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Coalesce held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
141 analytics
The team 141 managed to secure 6 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for 141 were eversince^ contributed 19 kills and qlay contributed 12 kills. 6941 of total damage by 141 could not prevent Coalesce from securing the victory
On the defensive side, 141 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires