Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
12.73.8
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
17.85.6
Éliminations avec M4A4 en moyenne par carte
93.6448
Dégâts avec M4A4 en moyenne (par tour)
55.712.7
Éliminations avec AWP en moyenne par carte
246.5798
Dégâts avec AWP en moyenne (par tour)
7921.6
Assistances en moyenne par carte
124.3517
Dégâts (total/round)
39473
Score du joueur (round)
42471012
Score du joueur (round)
40501012
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Informations
Match analysis of EC Brugge vs Sangal by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between EC Brugge and Sangal, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Dust II, Nuke, Mirage, and victory was secured by EC Brugge. The MVP of this match was Stev0se.
EC Brugge analytics
The team EC Brugge secured 47 out of 86 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Mirage. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for EC Brugge were Stev0se contributed 77 kills and ritchiEE contributed 65 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 32856 overall damage.
On the defensive side, EC Brugge held their ground firmly, successfully defending 33 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sangal analytics
The team Sangal managed to secure 39 out of 86 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sangal were paz contributed 76 kills and S3NSEY contributed 55 kills. 29286 of total damage by Sangal could not prevent EC Brugge from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sangal struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 27 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires