0 Commentaires
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec M4A1 en moyenne par carte
184.6963
Dégâts avec M4A1 en moyenne (par tour)
69.116.7
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
14.84.6
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
01:41s00:39s
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
6630
Dégâts en moyenne (par tour)
141.81939.7
Tirs (total/round)
9016
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov (total/round)
12723.8
Informations
Map Analysis of EC Brugge vs BLUEJAYS by the Bo3.gg Team
EC Brugge on Inferno Analysis
EC Brugge demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for EC Brugge on Inferno were joel, who contributed 33 kills, and ritchiEE, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9988 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, EC Brugge held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
BLUEJAYS on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for BLUEJAYS, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for BLUEJAYS on Inferno included CacaNito, who contributed 21 kills, and kyxsan, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8428 total damage, BLUEJAYS couldn't prevent EC Brugge from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, BLUEJAYS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires