0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Nuke (M2)
Records Nuke
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:19s01:30s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:30s01:30s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:25s01:30s
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
19.45.6
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
13.24.6
Dégâts avec M4A1 en moyenne (par tour)
45.516.7
Éliminations avec M4A1 en moyenne par carte
154.6963
Dégâts avec M4A1 en moyenne (par tour)
47.316.7
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Informations
Map Analysis of CEPTER vs Astralis Talent by the Bo3.gg Team
CEPTER on Nuke Analysis
CEPTER demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 15 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for CEPTER on Nuke were Basso, who contributed 20 kills, and Gnøffe, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 9626 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Nuke, CEPTER held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Astralis Talent on Nuke Analysis
Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Astralis Talent, as they managed to secure 12 out of 27 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Astralis Talent on Nuke included Kristou, who contributed 23 kills, and Patti, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9758 total damage, Astralis Talent couldn't prevent CEPTER from securing victory on Nuke
On the defensive side of Nuke, Astralis Talent struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires