avantage aux équipes Inferno (M2)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
01:59s00:39s
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
14.23.4
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
3315.0371
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
12.63.4
Round rapide (sec)
00:34s01:54s
Score du joueur (round)
39061012
Tirs (total/round)
8516
Score du joueur (round)
36211012
As du joueur
1
Multikills x-
4
Informations
Map Analysis of CEPTER vs Astralis Talent by the Bo3.gg Team
CEPTER on Inferno Analysis
CEPTER demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 19 out of 35 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for CEPTER on Inferno were Vester, who contributed 23 kills, and Damkilde, who added 27 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 12179 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, CEPTER held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Astralis Talent on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Astralis Talent, as they managed to secure 16 out of 35 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Astralis Talent on Inferno included Altekz, who contributed 25 kills, and br0, who added 27 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 12545 total damage, Astralis Talent couldn't prevent CEPTER from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Astralis Talent struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires