0 Commentaires
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec M4A1 en moyenne par carte
54.4189
Dégâts avec M4A1 en moyenne (par tour)
51.116.3
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
21.6027
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
33.14.8
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
21.6027
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
244.8
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
714.5022
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
184.1
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
2528
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
203.4
Informations
Map Analysis of Case vs Solid by the Bo3.gg Team
Solid on Inferno Analysis
Solid demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 4 out of 7 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Solid on Inferno were xureba, who contributed 10 kills, and ALLE, who added 7 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 2734 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Solid held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Case on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Case, as they managed to secure 3 out of 7 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Case on Inferno included bsd, who contributed 5 kills, and urban0, who added 4 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 2138 total damage, Case couldn't prevent Solid from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Case struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires