avantage aux équipes Inferno (M2)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
156.732
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
01:39s00:39s
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
5930
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
58.825.3
Tirs (total/round)
8716
Tirs (total/round)
8516
Score du joueur (round)
36271012
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Éliminations d'équipier
1
Durée des éblouissements par flash sur un round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Informations
Map Analysis of CAMO vs Ground Zero by the Bo3.gg Team
Ground Zero on Inferno Analysis
Ground Zero demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Ground Zero on Inferno were Versa, who contributed 28 kills, and nexar, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9140 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Ground Zero held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
CAMO on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for CAMO, as they managed to secure 7 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for CAMO on Inferno included NikkeZ, who contributed 21 kills, and Cyanide, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7113 total damage, CAMO couldn't prevent Ground Zero from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, CAMO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires