0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Score
5.9
6.5
Nuke1.8
Manches gagnées
30
38
Nuke8
Éliminations
221
251
Nuke21
Dégâts
25.11K
26.8K
Nuke1200
Économie
1.35M
1.42M
Nuke41900
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
176.5888
Round rapide (sec)
00:32s01:55s
Round rapide (sec)
00:35s01:55s
Score du joueur (round)
40341011
Score du joueur (round)
42401011
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Éliminations au couteau
11
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
136.5888
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Informations
Match analysis of Brahmas vs Strife by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Brahmas and Strife, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Inferno, Nuke, and victory was secured by Brahmas. The MVP of this match was YuZ.
Brahmas analytics
The team Brahmas secured 30 out of 68 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Brahmas were taza contributed 50 kills and Slash contributed 48 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 25119 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Brahmas held their ground firmly, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Strife analytics
The team Strife managed to secure 38 out of 68 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Strife were YuZ contributed 67 kills and Gabie contributed 52 kills. 26787 of total damage by Strife could not prevent Brahmas from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Strife struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires