0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Dust II (M2)
Records Dust II
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:31s01:25s
Éliminations par grenade HE en moyenne par carte
21.121
Dégâts avec AWP en moyenne (par tour)
62.421.6
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
6028
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
41.4482
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
19.44.1
Score du joueur (round)
37851010
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Informations
Map Analysis of Bounty Hunters vs Case by the Bo3.gg Team
Bounty Hunters on Dust II Analysis
Bounty Hunters demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Bounty Hunters on Dust II were KAISER, who contributed 19 kills, and piriajr, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 8719 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, Bounty Hunters held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Case on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Case, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Case on Dust II included urban0, who contributed 16 kills, and bsd, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7520 total damage, Case couldn't prevent Bounty Hunters from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, Case struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires