0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
9830
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
02:13s00:39s
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
9430
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
9430
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
3115.0371
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
6.82
Tirs (total/round)
11816
Tirs (total/round)
9316
Dégâts (total/round)
40073
Score du joueur (round)
41211012
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Informations
Match analysis of TBC vs INDINDA by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between TBC and INDINDA, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by INDINDA. The MVP of this match was gokushima.
INDINDA analytics
The team INDINDA secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for INDINDA were gokushima contributed 27 kills and lampada contributed 27 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 14024 overall damage.
On the defensive side, INDINDA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
TBC analytics
The team TBC managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for TBC were Stardust contributed 30 kills and fury5k contributed 26 kills. 13160 of total damage by TBC could not prevent INDINDA from securing the victory
On the defensive side, TBC struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires