0 Commentaires
Records Dust II
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:30s01:25s
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
6628
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
11.53.4
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
12.44.1
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
41.8164
Dégâts avec M4A1 en moyenne (par tour)
47.216.3
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
31.4482
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
12.34.1
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
5028
Victoires éco contre achat complet
1
Informations
Map Analysis of Apogee vs OG by the Bo3.gg Team
OG on Dust II Analysis
OG demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for OG on Dust II were Nexius, who contributed 15 kills, and Buzz, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 7607 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, OG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Apogee on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Apogee, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Apogee on Dust II included Prism, who contributed 17 kills, and POLO, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6062 total damage, Apogee couldn't prevent OG from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, Apogee struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires