0 Commentaires
Records Anubis
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:35s01:24s
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
15.34.8
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
136.4203
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
75.525.2
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
124.2
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
116.4203
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
69.325.2
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
12.94.2
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
41.4516
Éliminations en ouverture en moyenne par carte
5.952.804
Informations
Map Analysis of Apogee vs kONO by the Bo3.gg Team
kONO on Anubis Analysis
kONO demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 12 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for kONO on Anubis were amster, who contributed 19 kills, and nifee3, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 6987 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, kONO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Apogee on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Apogee, as they managed to secure 5 out of 17 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Apogee on Anubis included hfah, who contributed 18 kills, and Jcobbb, who added 8 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5937 total damage, Apogee couldn't prevent kONO from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Apogee struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires