Mirage
10 - 13
Inferno
13 - 10
Anubis
13 - 5
BC.Game Tableau des résultats

+/-

SCORES DES CARTES

46

34

20

+12

81

14:9

12

2

Mirage6

7.0

+15%

55

48

15

+7

96

8:7

18

0

Mirage7.8

6.8

+10%

44

35

6

+9

66

6:1

11

3

Mirage4.9

6.4

+2%

37

39

17

-2

78

6:4

9

0

Mirage5.8

6.1

-2%

39

30

10

+9

58

5:4

7

0

Mirage5.4

5.8

-2%

Total

221

186

68

+35

380

39:25

57

5

Mirage6

6.4

+5%

EYEBALLERS Tableau des résultats

+/-

SCORES DES CARTES

48

42

8

+6

71

5:5

13

1

Mirage6.1

6.4

+2%

36

50

17

-14

70

8:11

9

0

Mirage7

5.8

-12%

37

42

8

-5

64

4:11

7

2

Mirage7.5

5.6

-7%

32

42

14

-10

60

5:6

7

2

Mirage6.3

5.5

-5%

33

47

10

-14

59

3:6

6

0

Mirage5

5.2

-15%

Total

186

223

57

-37

324

25:39

42

5

Mirage6.4

5.7

-7%

YouTubecs2
score predict & Analytics Insights
2 - 0
Résultat
2 - 1
1 - 2
0 - 2
Avantages des équipes

Cartes

Score

6.5

5.6

Mirage0.4

Manches gagnées

36

28

Mirage3

Éliminations

221

187

Mirage11

Dégâts

24.28K

21.14K

Mirage311

Économie

1.34M

1.25M

Mirage26300

Enregistrements Match

Record/Temps/Carte

Val/M

Établi par

Adversaire

Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte

  •  Anubis

31.5972

Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte

  •  Anubis

41.4531

Échanges en moyenne par carte

  •  Anubis

7.923.3817

Round rapide (sec)

  •  Anubis

00:20s01:55s

Score du joueur (round)

  •  Anubis

40611010

Multikills x-

  •  Anubis

4

Clutch (adversaires)

  •  Anubis

2

Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte

  •  Inferno

41.5972

Score du joueur (round)

  •  Inferno

43391010

Score du joueur (round)

  •  Inferno

36921010

Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Choix & interdictions
Nuke
Nuke
Interdiction
Ancient
Ancient
Interdiction
Mirage
Mirage
Choix
Inferno
Inferno
Choix
Train
Train
Interdiction
Dust II
Dust II
Interdiction
Anubis
Anubis
Décideur
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois

Anubis

37%

Inferno

23%

Ancient

18%

Nuke

6%

Dust II

4%

Mirage

4%

Train

0%

Dernières 5 cartes

Anubis

58%

45

5

g
p
p
g
g

Inferno

58%

19

5

g
g
p
g
g

Ancient

60%

52

4

p
g
g
p
g

Nuke

29%

14

24

fb
fb
fb
fb
fb

Dust II

59%

29

4

g
g
p
g
g

Mirage

60%

43

0

g
g
p
g
p

Train

0%

0

9

fb
fb
fb
fb
fb

Dernières 5 cartes

Anubis

21%

19

14

p
p
p
fb
p

Inferno

35%

26

1

g
p
g
g
p

Ancient

42%

31

7

p
g
p
p
fb

Nuke

35%

17

16

g
fb
fb
fb
fb

Dust II

63%

8

11

p
g
g
g
p

Mirage

56%

25

0

p
g
g
p
p

Train

0%

0

2

fb
fb
Derniers résultats
Matchs précédents
Informations
Match analysis of BC.Game vs EYEBALLERS by the Bo3.gg Team

In the CS2 match between BC.Game and EYEBALLERS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Anubis, Inferno, Mirage, and victory was secured by BC.Game. The MVP of this match was CYPHER.


BC.Game analytics

The team BC.Game secured 36 out of 64 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Inferno. They also successfully set 7 bombs during the match.


The standout players for BC.Game were CYPHER contributed 46 kills and jkaem contributed 55 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 24255 overall damage.


On the defensive side, BC.Game held their ground firmly, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.


EYEBALLERS analytics

The team EYEBALLERS managed to secure 28 out of 64 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 10 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.


The standout players for EYEBALLERS were JW contributed 48 kills and poiii contributed 36 kills. 21036 of total damage by EYEBALLERS could not prevent BC.Game from securing the victory


On the defensive side, EYEBALLERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Commentaires
Par date