0 Commentaires
53
84
9
-31
299
7:13
9
1
-20%
avantage aux équipes Vertigo (M2)
Records Vertigo
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
12.83.4
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
6125.3
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
154.6
Dégâts avec Desert Eagle en moyenne (par tour)
16.75.4
Éliminations en ouverture en moyenne par carte
7.922.9135
Score du joueur (round)
39171012
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Éliminations d'équipier
1
Éliminations d'équipier
1
Informations
Map Analysis of Bad News Eagles vs SAW by the Bo3.gg Team
SAW on Vertigo Analysis
SAW demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 16 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for SAW on Vertigo were story, who contributed 23 kills, and JUST, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 8754 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Bad News Eagles on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for Bad News Eagles, as they managed to secure 6 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Bad News Eagles on Vertigo included rigoN, who contributed 15 kills, and gxx-, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6587 total damage, Bad News Eagles couldn't prevent SAW from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Bad News Eagles struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires