Aurora Young Blud Tableau des résultats

+/-

SCORES DES CARTES

23

14

4

+9

109

4:1

5

0

Anubis8.4

8.4

+39%

18

16

5

+2

77

4:1

6

0

Anubis7.2

7.2

-5%

16

16

4

0

83

2:2

4

1

Anubis6.5

6.5

+2%

11

15

5

-4

60

1:3

2

0

Anubis5.2

5.2

-4%

9

16

7

-7

56

1:2

2

0

Anubis5.1

5.1

-22%

Total

77

77

25

0

386

12:9

19

1

Anubis6.5

6.5

+2%

esmagaB Tableau des résultats

+/-

SCORES DES CARTES

26

15

1

+11

109

3:2

8

0

Anubis8.1

8.1

0%

17

15

10

+2

94

4:4

5

1

Anubis7

7.0

+6%

13

12

4

+1

55

1:3

3

4

Anubis5.8

5.8

-9%

12

18

5

-6

81

0:1

2

0

Anubis5.7

5.7

0%

9

17

6

-8

51

1:2

3

1

Anubis4.8

4.8

-25%

Total

77

77

26

0

390

9:12

21

6

Anubis6.3

6.3

-9%

SkinClub Worldwide
score predict & Analytics Insights
1 - 0
Résultat
0 - 1
Avantages des équipes

Cartes

Score

6.5

6.3

Anubis-0.2

Manches gagnées

8

13

Anubis5

Éliminations

77

78

Anubis1

Dégâts

8.1K

8.26K

Anubis158

Économie

386.4K

412.95K

Anubis26550

Enregistrements Match

Record/Temps/Carte

Val/M

Établi par

Adversaire

Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte

  •  Anubis

41.8164

Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte

  •  Anubis

31.4482

Échanges en moyenne par carte

  •  Anubis

9.033.428

Round rapide (sec)

  •  Anubis

00:34s01:55s

Round rapide (sec)

  •  Anubis

00:31s01:55s

Dégâts (total/round)

  •  Anubis

40073

Score du joueur (round)

  •  Anubis

42171010

Score du joueur (round)

  •  Anubis

34871010

Multikills x-

  •  Anubis

4

Multikills x-

  •  Anubis

4

Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
  • Titulaire

  • Titulaire

  • Titulaire

  • Titulaire

  • Titulaire

Il n'y a actuellement aucune composition d'équipe
Choix & interdictions

Il n'y a actuellement aucune information liée à ce choix de cartes
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois

Inferno

67%

Dust II

64%

Mirage

36%

Vertigo

17%

Anubis

16%

Ancient

10%

Nuke

0%

Dernières 5 cartes

Inferno

67%

33

1

p
g
g
p
p

Dust II

64%

14

8

g
p
p
g
p

Mirage

64%

25

3

g
p
g
g
g

Vertigo

33%

15

9

p
p
p
g
g

Anubis

48%

40

4

g
g
p
g
p

Ancient

43%

28

2

g
g
p
p

Nuke

0%

0

28

fb
fb
fb
fb
fb

Dernières 5 cartes

Inferno

0%

3

2

p
p
p
fb

Dust II

0%

1

0

p

Mirage

100%

1

3

g
fb
fb

Vertigo

50%

4

0

g
p
p
g

Anubis

64%

11

0

p
g
p

Ancient

53%

17

1

p
p
g
p
p

Nuke

0%

1

0

p
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Les équipes ne se sont pas rencontrées au cours des 6 derniers mois
Matchs précédents
Informations
Match analysis of Aurora Young Blud vs esmagaB by the Bo3.gg Team

In the CS2 match between Aurora Young Blud and esmagaB, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by esmagaB. The MVP of this match was bluewhite.


esmagaB analytics

The team esmagaB secured 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.


The standout players for esmagaB were prBIm contributed 26 kills and Icarus contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8181 overall damage.


On the defensive side, esmagaB held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.


Aurora Young Blud analytics

The team Aurora Young Blud managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.


The standout players for Aurora Young Blud were bluewhite contributed 23 kills and gr1ks contributed 18 kills. 8097 of total damage by Aurora Young Blud could not prevent esmagaB from securing the victory


On the defensive side, Aurora Young Blud struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Commentaires
Par date