0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Score
5.7
6.3
Dust II0.6
Manches gagnées
14
16
Dust II2
Éliminations
95
108
Dust II13
Dégâts
10.12K
11.7K
Dust II1579
Économie
621.5K
659.3K
Dust II37800
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Ancient
50%
Mirage
L
47%
Inferno
L
33%
Vertigo
33%
Overpass
L
16%
Nuke
L
12%
Dust II
0%
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
50%
12
4
Mirage
53%
19
1
Inferno
0%
0
17
Vertigo
33%
9
5
Overpass
44%
9
4
Nuke
57%
7
3
Dust II
43%
7
4
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
0%
0
3
Mirage
100%
2
4
Inferno
33%
3
2
Vertigo
0%
2
0
Overpass
60%
5
2
Nuke
69%
16
0
Dust II
43%
7
1
Informations
Match analysis of Aurora vs LF0 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Aurora and LF0, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by Aurora. The MVP of this match was Kiro.
Aurora analytics
The team Aurora secured 30 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps . They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Aurora were Norwi contributed 25 kills and Lack1 contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10122 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Aurora held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
LF0 analytics
The team LF0 managed to secure 0 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for LF0 were Kiro contributed 30 kills and SP1NT contributed 27 kills. 11701 of total damage by LF0 could not prevent Aurora from securing the victory
On the defensive side, LF0 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires