0 Commentaires
79
78
23
+1
375
17:6
21
1
+3%
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M1)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
31.4429
Pourcentage de tirs à la tête
44%15%
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
14.34.7
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
51.8161
Assistances en moyenne par carte
11.964.3808
Victoires éco contre achat complet
1
Tirs (total/round)
8416
Score du joueur (round)
37991011
Dégâts (total/round)
44073
Score du joueur (round)
36341011
Informations
Map Analysis of ex-ENEIDA vs Aurora by the Bo3.gg Team
ex-ENEIDA on Inferno Analysis
ex-ENEIDA demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for ex-ENEIDA on Inferno were kensizor, who contributed 19 kills, and byr9, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8627 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, ex-ENEIDA held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Aurora on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Aurora, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Aurora on Inferno included Norwi, who contributed 23 kills, and BELCHONOKK, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8606 total damage, Aurora couldn't prevent ex-ENEIDA from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Aurora struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires