0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Anubis (M2)
Records Anubis
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:34s01:28s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:34s01:28s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:32s01:28s
Dégâts avec AUG en moyenne (par tour)
29.88.1
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2215.0791
Dégâts avec Tec-9 en moyenne (par tour)
11.43.4
Dégâts (total/round)
44673
Score du joueur (round)
35021012
Score du joueur (round)
37841012
Multikills x-
4
Informations
Map Analysis of Aurora vs ALTERNATE aTTaX by the Bo3.gg Team
ALTERNATE aTTaX on Anubis Analysis
ALTERNATE aTTaX demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for ALTERNATE aTTaX on Anubis were awzek, who contributed 23 kills, and PANIX, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 9399 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, ALTERNATE aTTaX held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Aurora on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Aurora, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Aurora on Anubis included SELLTER, who contributed 19 kills, and Lack1, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9503 total damage, Aurora couldn't prevent ALTERNATE aTTaX from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Aurora struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires