0 Commentaires
72
66
22
+6
372
8:13
17
1
+1%
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M1)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Série de victoires de l'équipe
103
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
1914.6931
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
8.12
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
11.83.4
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
13.64.7
Tirs (total/round)
9816
Tirs (total/round)
10016
Dégâts (total/round)
48373
Score du joueur (round)
46581011
Score du joueur (round)
38071011
Informations
Map Analysis of Astralis vs Virtus.pro by the Bo3.gg Team
Virtus.pro on Inferno Analysis
Virtus.pro demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Virtus.pro on Inferno were FL1T, who contributed 18 kills, and Jame, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7809 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Virtus.pro held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Astralis on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Astralis, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Astralis on Inferno included dev1ce, who contributed 20 kills, and stavn, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7393 total damage, Astralis couldn't prevent Virtus.pro from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Astralis struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires