0 Commentaires
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Vertigo
53%
Ancient
44%
Dust II
16%
Overpass
9%
Inferno
6%
Mirage
6%
Nuke
5%
Dernières 5 cartes
Vertigo
17%
6
37
Ancient
56%
16
18
Dust II
45%
11
26
Overpass
65%
17
4
Inferno
69%
13
25
Mirage
50%
20
18
Nuke
58%
24
2
Dernières 5 cartes
Vertigo
70%
20
6
Ancient
100%
1
53
Dust II
61%
23
5
Overpass
56%
16
13
Inferno
63%
19
18
Mirage
44%
9
27
Nuke
63%
27
7
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- gpgpp
- ggggp
Informations
Match analysis of Astralis vs Eternal Fire by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Astralis and Eternal Fire, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by Astralis. The MVP of this match was blameF.
Astralis analytics
The team Astralis secured 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Astralis were blameF contributed 23 kills and gla1ve contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9146 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Astralis held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Eternal Fire analytics
The team Eternal Fire managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Eternal Fire were woxic contributed 18 kills and MAJ3R contributed 18 kills. 8752 of total damage by Eternal Fire could not prevent Astralis from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Eternal Fire struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires