0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M3)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
12.23.4
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
7.32
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
17.15.6
Éliminations avec M4A1 en moyenne par carte
134.6963
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
16.25.6
Victoires éco contre achat complet
1
Dégâts (total/round)
44373
Score du joueur (round)
42951012
Score du joueur (round)
36271012
Multikills x-
4
Informations
Map Analysis of Astralis Talent vs GTZ by the Bo3.gg Team
Astralis Talent on Inferno Analysis
Astralis Talent demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Astralis Talent on Inferno were MistR, who contributed 21 kills, and br0, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 10131 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Astralis Talent held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
GTZ on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for GTZ, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for GTZ on Inferno included Icarus, who contributed 17 kills, and rafaxF, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8500 total damage, GTZ couldn't prevent Astralis Talent from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, GTZ struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires