Terminé
2
Basique

0 Commentaires

Anubis
8 - 13
Nuke
13 - 9
Train
11 - 13
Astralis Talent Tableau des résultats

+/-

SCORES DES CARTES

51

50

11

+1

82

6:5

13

3

Anubis5.7

4.2

+6%

41

51

10

-10

71

10:7

8

0

Anubis7

4.2

-6%

45

54

13

-9

77

7:7

13

1

Anubis5.6

4.0

-11%

40

49

11

-9

63

6:8

9

2

Anubis5.9

4.0

-9%

41

48

11

-7

71

2:9

9

2

Anubis4.1

3.4

-2%

Total

218

252

56

-34

364

31:36

52

8

Nuke6.7

4.0

-4%

FAVBET Tableau des résultats

+/-

SCORES DES CARTES

60

38

12

+22

80

7:2

13

1

Anubis8.9

4.7

+24%

59

46

18

+13

93

10:7

16

0

Anubis7.5

4.6

+10%

53

47

20

+6

90

9:8

12

2

Anubis6.5

4.5

+10%

35

44

15

-9

61

3:7

6

2

Anubis6.3

3.3

+6%

43

47

26

-4

77

7:7

10

0

Anubis4.6

3.1

-2%

Total

250

222

91

+28

401

36:31

57

5

Nuke5.9

4.0

+10%

Clash.gg 3 cases
score predict & Analytics Insights
2 - 0
2 - 1
Résultat
1 - 2
0 - 2
Avantages des équipes

Cartes

Score

4.1

4.2

Anubis1.1

Manches gagnées

32

35

Anubis5

Éliminations

218

250

Anubis20

Dégâts

24.43K

26.89K

Anubis1806

Économie

1.23M

1.37M

Anubis95700

Enregistrements Match

Record/Temps/Carte

Val/M

Établi par

Adversaire

Éliminations avec AUG en moyenne par carte

  •  Train

92.5617

Éliminations avec Tec-9 en moyenne par carte

  •  Train

31.3022

Round rapide (sec)

  •  Train

00:28s01:55s

Round rapide (sec)

  •  Train

00:32s01:55s

Round rapide (sec)

  •  Train

00:28s01:55s

As du joueur

  •  Train

1

Clutch (adversaires)

  •  Train

2

Éliminations au couteau

  •  Train

11

Éliminations au couteau

  •  Train

11

Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte

  •  Nuke

51.8162

Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Choix & interdictions

Il n'y a actuellement aucune information liée à ce choix de cartes
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois

Train

67%

Dust II

47%

Mirage

34%

Anubis

34%

Nuke

33%

Inferno

13%

Ancient

9%

Dernières 5 cartes

Train

0%

1

0

Dust II

18%

11

20

fb
fb
fb
fb
fb

Mirage

33%

24

16

g
p
g
g

Anubis

31%

29

13

p
p
g
p

Nuke

72%

53

0

g
g
g
p
g

Inferno

55%

33

1

g
g
p

Ancient

48%

40

5

g
g
p
p

Dernières 5 cartes

Train

67%

3

2

fb
g

Dust II

65%

31

14

p
g
g
g
p

Mirage

67%

3

61

fb
fb
fb
fb
fb

Anubis

65%

52

5

g
g
p
g
g

Nuke

39%

33

15

g
g
g
g
g

Inferno

68%

50

2

p
g
p
g
p

Ancient

57%

46

12

p
p
g
p
g
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Les équipes ne se sont pas rencontrées au cours des 6 derniers mois
Matchs précédents
Informations
Match analysis of Astralis Talent vs FAVBET by the Bo3.gg Team

In the CS2 match between Astralis Talent and FAVBET, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Train, Nuke, Anubis, and victory was secured by FAVBET. The MVP of this match was t3ns1on.


FAVBET analytics

The team FAVBET secured 35 out of 67 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Train, Anubis. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.


The standout players for FAVBET were t3ns1on contributed 60 kills and j3kie contributed 59 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 26885 overall damage.


On the defensive side, FAVBET held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.


Astralis Talent analytics

The team Astralis Talent managed to secure 32 out of 67 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 8 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.


The standout players for Astralis Talent were kiR contributed 51 kills and Zanto contributed 41 kills. 24431 of total damage by Astralis Talent could not prevent FAVBET from securing the victory


On the defensive side, Astralis Talent struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Commentaires
Par date