0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Nuke (M2)
Records Nuke
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:28s01:23s
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:32s01:23s
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2714.2369
Éliminations avec M4A1 en moyenne par carte
144.306
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
3314.2369
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
6.12
Dégâts (total/round)
40073
Score du joueur (round)
39151010
Multikills x-
4
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Informations
Map Analysis of Astralis Talent vs CPH Wolves by the Bo3.gg Team
CPH Wolves on Nuke Analysis
CPH Wolves demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for CPH Wolves on Nuke were b1elany, who contributed 29 kills, and aNdu, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 10724 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Nuke, CPH Wolves held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Astralis Talent on Nuke Analysis
Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Astralis Talent, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Astralis Talent on Nuke included kroK, who contributed 27 kills, and Zanto, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10387 total damage, Astralis Talent couldn't prevent CPH Wolves from securing victory on Nuke
On the defensive side of Nuke, Astralis Talent struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires