0 Commentaires
Records Vertigo
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
11.13.4
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
8830
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
02:06s00:39s
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
10030
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
3515.0371
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
11.93.4
Score du joueur (round)
35821012
Tirs (total/round)
9516
Tirs (total/round)
11716
Dégâts (total/round)
38873
Informations
Map Analysis of ARCTIC vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team
ARCTIC on Vertigo Analysis
ARCTIC demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 19 out of 35 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for ARCTIC on Vertigo were short, who contributed 28 kills, and keiz, who added 27 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 13248 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, ARCTIC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Sharks on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for Sharks, as they managed to secure 16 out of 35 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Sharks on Vertigo included drg, who contributed 31 kills, and Gafolo, who added 25 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 12901 total damage, Sharks couldn't prevent ARCTIC from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires