0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Dust II (M1)
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Ancient
47%
Vertigo
46%
Nuke
37%
Dust II
24%
Overpass
23%
Mirage
23%
Inferno
8%
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
47%
17
10
Vertigo
0%
1
22
Nuke
70%
10
4
Dust II
50%
22
2
Overpass
83%
6
13
Mirage
53%
19
0
Inferno
69%
16
6
Dernières 5 cartes
Ancient
0%
1
31
Vertigo
46%
13
8
Nuke
33%
12
10
Dust II
74%
27
1
Overpass
60%
10
16
Mirage
76%
29
1
Inferno
61%
28
3
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Matchs précédents
- ggggp
- pggpg
Informations
Map Analysis of Apeks vs Iron Branch by the Bo3.gg Team
Iron Branch on Dust II Analysis
Iron Branch demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 29 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Iron Branch on Dust II were MaSvAl, who contributed 28 kills, and kensizor, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 10604 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, Iron Branch held their ground firmly, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Apeks on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Apeks, as they managed to secure 0 out of 29 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Apeks on Dust II included jL, who contributed 21 kills, and nawwk, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10061 total damage, Apeks couldn't prevent Iron Branch from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, Apeks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires