0 Commentaires
Avantages des équipes
Enregistrements Match
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
106.4203
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
31.4516
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
31.8168
Round rapide (sec)
00:18s01:55s
Round rapide (sec)
00:32s01:55s
Multikills x-
4
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois
Inferno
73%
Vertigo
47%
Dust II
31%
Mirage
26%
Ancient
8%
Anubis
4%
Nuke
1%
Dernières 5 cartes
Inferno
0%
0
12
Vertigo
0%
4
3
Dust II
29%
7
5
Mirage
24%
21
1
Ancient
55%
29
0
Anubis
69%
13
5
Nuke
31%
16
0
Dernières 5 cartes
Inferno
73%
40
3
Vertigo
47%
17
32
Dust II
60%
25
16
Mirage
50%
2
52
Ancient
63%
43
7
Anubis
65%
52
3
Nuke
30%
30
11
Informations
Match analysis of Anonymo vs FAVBET by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Anonymo and FAVBET, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by FAVBET. The MVP of this match was max.
FAVBET analytics
The team FAVBET secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FAVBET were max contributed 15 kills and j3kie contributed 13 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 6425 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FAVBET held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Anonymo analytics
The team Anonymo managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Anonymo were Enzo contributed 16 kills and Ex1st contributed 7 kills. 4769 of total damage by Anonymo could not prevent FAVBET from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Anonymo struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires