Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Plantation de bombe rapide (sec)
00:30s01:26s
Pourcentage de tirs à la tête
41%15%
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
31.8171
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
19.75.8
Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte
31.6074
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
17.34.7
Dégâts des cocktails Molotov en moyenne (par tour)
6.82
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
4129
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
1414.6931
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
72.525.3
Informations
Map Analysis of AMKAL vs Liquid by the Bo3.gg Team
Liquid on Inferno Analysis
Liquid demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 15 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Liquid on Inferno were cadiaN, who contributed 14 kills, and YEKINDAR, who added 12 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 6056 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Liquid held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
AMKAL on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for AMKAL, as they managed to secure 2 out of 15 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for AMKAL on Inferno included Krad, who contributed 12 kills, and icy, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4412 total damage, AMKAL couldn't prevent Liquid from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, AMKAL struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires