0 Commentaires
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Pourcentage de tirs à la tête
44%15%
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
13.24.8
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
4128
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
1314.5022
Éliminations avec Glock en moyenne par carte
21.4482
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
14.34.1
Dégâts avec Glock en moyenne (par tour)
13.54.1
Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte
96.5019
Dégâts avec AK47 en moyenne (par tour)
61.625.2
Éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (opp)
4728
Informations
Map Analysis of AMKAL vs GUN5 by the Bo3.gg Team
AMKAL on Inferno Analysis
AMKAL demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 9 out of 14 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for AMKAL on Inferno were nota, who contributed 13 kills, and Forester, who added 10 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 4724 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, AMKAL held their ground firmly, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
GUN5 on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for GUN5, as they managed to secure 5 out of 14 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for GUN5 on Inferno included kelieN, who contributed 11 kills, and Easy, who added 9 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4319 total damage, GUN5 couldn't prevent AMKAL from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, GUN5 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires