0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Anubis (M0)
Records Anubis
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Éliminations avec AWP en moyenne par carte
166.4049
Dégâts avec AWP en moyenne (par tour)
62.921.6
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
13.33.4
Éliminations avec Galil en moyenne par carte
61.8164
Dégâts avec Galil en moyenne (par tour)
21.95.9
Score du joueur (round)
37571010
Score du joueur (round)
35191010
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Clutch (adversaires)
2
Informations
Map Analysis of ALTERNATE aTTaX vs Endpoint by the Bo3.gg Team
Endpoint on Anubis Analysis
Endpoint demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Endpoint on Anubis were CRUC1AL, who contributed 24 kills, and Surreal, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 9344 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Endpoint held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
ALTERNATE aTTaX on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for ALTERNATE aTTaX, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for ALTERNATE aTTaX on Anubis included ArroW, who contributed 15 kills, and hyped, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7280 total damage, ALTERNATE aTTaX couldn't prevent Endpoint from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, ALTERNATE aTTaX struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires