0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M1)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2715.0371
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
13.84.6
Dégâts des grenades HE en moyenne (par tour)
14.23.4
Durée des éblouissements par flash en moyenne sur une carte (sec)
01:49s00:39s
Score du joueur (round)
36781012
Dégâts (total/round)
41573
Score du joueur (round)
35471012
Tirs (total/round)
9616
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Informations
Map Analysis of ALTERNATE aTTaX vs cowana by the Bo3.gg Team
cowana on Inferno Analysis
cowana demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 15 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for cowana on Inferno were stfN, who contributed 19 kills, and PANIX, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8682 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, cowana held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
ALTERNATE aTTaX on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for ALTERNATE aTTaX, as they managed to secure 15 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for ALTERNATE aTTaX on Inferno included awzek, who contributed 22 kills, and FreeZe, who added 25 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10460 total damage, ALTERNATE aTTaX couldn't prevent cowana from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, ALTERNATE aTTaX struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires