0 Commentaires
avantage aux équipes Inferno (M2)
Records Inferno
Record/Temps/Carte
Val/M
Établi par
Adversaire
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
16.74.8
Dégâts avec USP en moyenne (par tour)
134.8
Fumigènes lancés en moyenne sur une carte
2314.3232
Victoires éco contre achat complet
1
Dégâts (total/round)
39573
Multikills x-
4
Multikills x-
4
Dégâts des grenades HE (total/round)
10226.1
Dégâts des grenades HE (total/round)
10526.1
Durée des éblouissements par flash sur un round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Informations
Map Analysis of ALTERNATE aTTaX vs 500 by the Bo3.gg Team
500 on Inferno Analysis
500 demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for 500 on Inferno were Rainwaker, who contributed 22 kills, and SHiPZ, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8133 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, 500 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
ALTERNATE aTTaX on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for ALTERNATE aTTaX, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for ALTERNATE aTTaX on Inferno included FreeZe, who contributed 17 kills, and hyped, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7753 total damage, ALTERNATE aTTaX couldn't prevent 500 from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, ALTERNATE aTTaX struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Commentaires