Alliance Tableau des résultats

+/-

SCORES DES CARTES

23

29

3

-6

60

11:6

4

1

Anubis6.3

5.9

-14%

25

28

4

-3

68

2:1

7

0

Anubis5.9

5.7

-9%

18

28

13

-10

73

2:5

3

1

Anubis6.1

5.6

-13%

21

33

7

-12

59

3:3

2

0

Anubis5.6

5.2

-11%

15

27

3

-12

45

2:4

4

0

Anubis5.1

4.5

-31%

Total

102

145

30

-43

306

20:19

20

2

Anubis5.8

5.4

-16%

CYBERSHOKE Tableau des résultats

+/-

SCORES DES CARTES

40

19

9

+21

98

5:3

12

2

Anubis8.6

8.0

+36%

25

23

13

+2

93

4:2

6

0

Anubis6.3

6.4

+8%

28

16

0

+12

69

1:3

7

1

Anubis5.7

6.2

+10%

23

19

13

+4

69

5:5

4

0

Anubis5.5

6.0

+1%

29

25

6

+4

77

4:7

6

1

Anubis4.2

6.0

+2%

Total

145

102

41

+43

406

19:20

35

4

Anubis6.1

6.5

+11%

Clash.gg 3 cases
score predict & Analytics Insights
2 - 0
2 - 1
1 - 2
Résultat
0 - 2
Avantages des équipes

Cartes

Score

5.3

6.6

Anubis0.3

Manches gagnées

11

13

Anubis2

Éliminations

71

77

Anubis6

Dégâts

8K

8.48K

Anubis482

Économie

708.15K

839.05K

Anubis4000

Enregistrements Match

Record/Temps/Carte

Val/M

Établi par

Adversaire

Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte

  •  Dust II

106.3792

Éliminations avec USP en moyenne par carte

  •  Dust II

31.5972

Éliminations avec M4A1 en moyenne par carte

  •  Dust II

84.306

Assistances en moyenne par carte

  •  Dust II

8.484.4987

Round rapide (sec)

  •  Dust II

00:19s01:55s

Dégâts (total/round)

  •  Dust II

50073

Score du joueur (round)

  •  Dust II

38261010

As du joueur

  •  Dust II

1

Multikills x-

  •  Dust II

4

Éliminations avec AK47 en moyenne par carte

  •  Anubis

166.3792

Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Composition de l'équipe
Choix & interdictions
Inferno
Inferno
Interdiction
Mirage
Mirage
Interdiction
Anubis
Anubis
Choix
Dust II
Dust II
Choix
Train
Train
Interdiction
Ancient
Ancient
Interdiction
Nuke
Nuke
Décideur
Historique Taux de victoire par carte 6 derniers mois

Nuke

50%

Inferno

26%

Anubis

21%

Vertigo

12%

Dust II

7%

Ancient

3%

Mirage

1%

Dernières 5 cartes

Nuke

67%

6

28

g
g
p
g
p

Inferno

56%

39

0

p
g
g
p
p

Anubis

42%

26

7

g
g
p
g
g

Vertigo

47%

15

3

p
p
g
p
p

Dust II

36%

22

13

p
g
g
g
p

Ancient

52%

31

3

g
p
g
p
p

Mirage

54%

13

17

fb
fb
fb
fb
fb

Dernières 5 cartes

Nuke

17%

6

42

g
p
fb
fb
p

Inferno

30%

23

26

fb
fb
fb
fb
fb

Anubis

63%

71

0

g
g
g
p
g

Vertigo

35%

26

8

p
fb
g
g
p

Dust II

29%

17

24

p
p
p
p
p

Ancient

55%

47

2

g
p
p
p
p

Mirage

55%

33

4

p
g
p
g
p
Derniers résultats
Face à face
Les équipes ne se sont pas rencontrées au cours des 6 derniers mois
Matchs précédents
Informations
Match analysis of Alliance vs CYBERSHOKE by the Bo3.gg Team

In the CS2 match between Alliance and CYBERSHOKE, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Dust II, Anubis, and victory was secured by CYBERSHOKE. The MVP of this match was bl1x1.


CYBERSHOKE analytics

The team CYBERSHOKE secured 26 out of 40 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Anubis. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.


The standout players for CYBERSHOKE were bl1x1 contributed 40 kills and glowiing contributed 25 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15349 overall damage.


On the defensive side, CYBERSHOKE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.


Alliance analytics

The team Alliance managed to secure 14 out of 40 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 8 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.


The standout players for Alliance were twist contributed 23 kills and avid contributed 25 kills. 12174 of total damage by Alliance could not prevent CYBERSHOKE from securing the victory


On the defensive side, Alliance struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Commentaires
Par date